Your Northern Neck Real Estate & Chesapeake Bay Waterfront Property Blog


Click Here to Search Northern Neck MLS Listings

April 21, 2008

Northern Neck and Chesapeake Bay Crabbers Face Tougher Regulations

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing*, *Living in the Northern Neck* — admin @ 7:30 am

On Tuesday, April 23, VMRC will impose more regulations on the crabbers.

The crabbers have been accused of overfishing for years but they have started fighting back. Too late but they are fighting.

For over 30 years commercial waterman have been screaming about the degradation of the Chesapeake Bay that has been causing the decline of life in the Bay.

Although the crabbers will take another hit they have united and several environmental organizations have joined with them as they have threated suit.

Lawyers have advised them that they do have grounds for such a suit. This week the Virgina Waterman's Association will meet with an environmental group that has passed word to them that they have already prepared the legal work for such a suit. They have just been waiting for the right group to come along. They think the Virginia Waterman's Association is that group. 

  

March 12, 2008

Crab TD

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing* — admin @ 12:53 pm

Tougher crabbing limits are set in Virginia

Harsher restraints may come in April if numbers worsen, say regulators

Copied from the Times Dispatch. These regs will make it much rougher on Northern Neck and Chesapeake Bay crabbers. 

 

 

By LAWRENCE LATANE III

TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER

NEWPORT NEWS — State regulators passed new limits on the blue crab harvest and promised more to come after a bleak public hearing on the economically important species yesterday.

The measures enacted unanimously by the Virginia Marine Resources Commission are expected "to go a long way towards restoring this iconic resource for the commonwealth," commissioner Steve Bowman said.

Watermen packed the commission's meeting room and complained that water pollution — not harvest — has driven the crab population to its lowest point in decades.

"In this context of a declining ecosystem, today's fishing is tomorrow's overfishing," said Williamsburg waterman Kelly Place.

Many of the eight commissioners agreed but said the only tools immediately available to improve crab numbers are mandatory restrictions that will leave more crabs in the water to multiply.

Rules approved yesterday will go into effect on the March 17 opening of this year's crabbing season.

They include a requirement for watermen to leave two escape hatches open in all crab pots no matter where they are set. Previously, watermen crabbing in the mainstem of the bay and parts of the Eastern Shore had been able to crab legally with only one of the escape hatches open.

The hatches allow undersized crabs, especially small females, to avoid capture. Called cull rings, the hatches were mandated in 1996 when the commission enacted a series of 22 measures designed to reduce fishing pressure on blue crabs.

Last year, a commission study panel concluded the early restrictions had failed to buoy the crab population. It recommended that new conservation measures be implemented this spring.

The study panel said crab numbers have plunged 70 percent since 1991 and pointed out that the crab population is so low it has been overfished seven out of the past 10 years.

The commission said it needs to wait until its April 22 meeting to consider even harsher restraints on crab harvesting.

A Chesapeake Bay census of hibernating blue crabs is expected by April 1; scientists fear it may show the crab in even deeper trouble.

If the survey is as bad as expected, the commission will consider reducing by half the number of crab pots that watermen can fish for both hard crabs and "peelers," which produce high-priced soft crabs.

The commission also voted unanimously yesterday to advertise for public hearing at its April meeting a measure to curtail or close Virginia's historic winter crab dredge fishery. Totaling more than 300 boats a couple of decades ago, the fleet has shrunk to 55 this year because of declining catches, low prices and rising boat operating costs.

Watermen told the commission that they are as endangered as the crab seems to be.

"You're putting us out of business," said Tangier Island waterman Charles Pruitt.

But Bowman said doing nothing puts the crab population in danger of collapse. "If something is not done, I fear you won't have any crabs to deal with later on."
Contact Lawrence Latané III at (804) 333-3461 or llatane@timesdispatch.com.

Find out more about the Virginia Waterman 

 

February 27, 2008

Northern Neck Crabbers will be Effected by New Regulations

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing*, *Living in the Northern Neck* — admin @ 8:33 am

Copied from the Daily Press - Please note that overfishing is mentioned but what is not mentioned is that the commission publicly announced that the water quality is what has caused these conditions. KS

Crabbing limits are approved

Blue crab fishermen say the policies hurt them.

| 247-4534

February 27, 2008

 

NEWPORT NEWS - Virginia officials took a step Tuesday toward reining in commercial fishing pressure on a blue crab population scientists say is vulnerable to collapse.

Despite repeated claims from watermen that poor water quality and an increase in natural predators are driving down blue crab numbers more than overfishing, the Virginia Marine Resources Commission voted unanimously to adopt new crabbing regulations. And likely on the way in March and April are even more regulations.

"Things are bad. They're really bad," said Commissioner Steven G. Bowman, referring to a population trend that has seen the Chesapeake Bay's crabs decline to less than a third of the early-1990s numbers.

The blue crab remains the bedrock of one of Virginia's most lucrative commercial fisheries. But a panel of crab biologists concluded months ago that years of overfishing was cutting too far into the blue crab stock and its ability to reproduce.

Watermen, scientists and regulators have disagreed on how much to blame unhealthy waters versus overfishing. During a three-hour public hearing, people from all three groups repeatedly made the point that a degraded Chesapeake Bay is not an abstract problem, but a stark reality that hampers commercial industry and tears at working-the-water traditions of Virginia's bay communities.

Bowman answered concerns from watermen that tougher regulations will cause them hardship by saying the commission was acting in the best long-term interest of the crabs and therefore the crab industry.

"You'd be just as right to come back here in five years (if the crab population collapsed), and say, 'Why didn't you do anything? It was your job to protect the crabs?' " Bowman said.

Doug Jenkins, president of the Twin Rivers Watermen's Association, said previous studies were too quick to single out overfishing. He questioned why researchers haven't looked more closely at the behavior and numbers of the crabs' natural predators — particularly croaker, rockfish and blue catfish.

Charles Pruitt, a Tangier Island waterman, asked why, if overfishing is the primary cause of the blue crab decline, does he also find far fewer starfish and spider crabs when he fishes? These species are not commercially fished, but their numbers seem to have declined just as fast, Pruitt said.

"We're not going to survive," Pruitt said. "We're gone. If you issue all these regulations, you might as well throw us out."

VMRC board member Rick Robins said the dire crab situation left the commission no choice.

He also said that the panel of scientists that targeted overfishing did not neglect to take the bay's ecological fragility into account.

"Our purpose is not to burn down the village to prove we can save it," he said. "This is not something we can shirk from."

 

 

February 26, 2008

Crab Regulations in Maryland Could Effect Northern Neck

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing* — admin @ 9:24 pm

Copied from The Baltimore Sun 

Measures to preserve crab population proposed

Plans offered by Md. biologists include licensing recreational crabbers

By Candus Thomson | Sun reporter

7:46 AM EST, February 26, 2008

State fisheries biologists are preparing a menu of options to reduce this season's harvest of blue crabs in the Chesapeake Bay, including licensing all recreational crabbers and curtailing the commercial harvest of female crabs until they reach spawning age.

A population survey is about a month from completion, but few scientists believe it will indicate that the number of crabs exceeds the 200 million target needed to sustain a robust rebuilding program. A drop below 86 million crabs might leave too few crabs to restock the population, said Lynn Fegley, a biologist with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

"The best-case scenario — over 200 million crabs — will not happen this year; I can almost guarantee it," Fegley told recreational anglers last night. "If the 2008 survey indicates over fishing, DNR will be obligated to act in 2008."

The agency will meet with commercial crabbers Thursday night in Annapolis.

Last year, Maryland's commercial crabbers caught slightly less than 22 million pounds, the second-lowest level in three decades. Virginia crabbers caught about the same amount.

Restrictions by Maryland and Virginia over the last seven years "seemed to have stopped the skid, but we haven't gotten where we need to go," Fegley said.

The most drastic measure would be closing the commercial season for up to two weeks. But Fegley said regulators would prefer setting size limits to protect female crabs until they can spawn. On the recreational side, proposals include requiring a license, setting catch limits and reducing the length of "trotlines" used to catch crabs.

The biggest question mark is whether Virginia will agree to restrictions. Virginia crabbers catch 70 percent of the female blue crabs in the bay, and watermen are allowed to harvest pregnant female crabs. Virginia also allows commercial dredging for crabs in the winter, an activity Maryland prohibits.

"We cannot do this alone," said Fegley, who has been working with Virginia officials. "If Virginia adopts [size limits], that's our biggest bang for the buck. … Virginia has said it will seriously consider this."

After meeting with commercial and recreational crabbers, DNR officials will brief state lawmakers on the best options by mid-March. Survey results are expected about April 1, and Fegley expects to have regulations in place by mid-April.

February 11, 2008

Copied Article From The Northern Neck News

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing*, *Living in the Northern Neck* — admin @ 12:54 pm

More on the Hatchery

I have been telling you about this oyster hatchery. There were 4 public input meetings. One in each of the 4 counties of the Northern Neck. 

The only local paper to cover the meetings was "The Northern Neck News". The story below was taken from that paper. There was also another story with concerns from an individual who is trying to start a hatchery. His brood stock is from a disease resistant native oyster.

Please note that at the end of the this article is stated, "It was unclear what measure of success the project would be guided by." That measure of success has still not been defined and it needs to be.

Testing the Water

 

Public input sought for regional hatchery project

Not everyone is sold on the idea of a regional oyster hatchery to be built in the Northern Neck, a concept that could produce revenue and jobs for the area if it works.

During informational meetings held throughout the area last week, some residents voiced questions about the $1 million project that could take years to complete.

"Have you chosen an operating business structure?" asked JC Berger during the Feb. 1 meeting held in Warsaw. Director of the Northern Neck District Planning Commission, Jerry Davis, fielded questions. He said the plan is to include a "private-public partnership, but what shape will be hammered out by the feasibility study."

The study could begin soon if funds are secured through the NNPDC and local oyster houses. Davis said grant money awarded by Virginia Housing and Urban Development coffers and federal Department of Commerce officials could kick start the campaign to revitalize the oyster industry in the ‘Neck, a goal of the NNPDC.

He said about a year ago the need for a local oyster hatchery was discovered by area leaders through the NNPDC and economic partnership it’s part of.

Since then, the group has moved towards but not into the formal study to consider the feasibility of the plan, which would include a facility being built on land probably donated by area governments, according to Davis.

A.J. Erksine is the aquaculture manager for Cowart Seafood Corporation and the Bevans Oyster Company. He accompanied Davis to the meetings last week and answered audience members’ questions about the logistics and science behind producing baby, or seed, oysters.

"The goal is to produce larvae and seed," he said. "Research is important and may be managed [at the facility] later."

He said the facility would be about the size of a "mini-Wal-Mart" and would probably need a few acres of waterfront property. He said salinity levels and elevation of the land would dictate the best fit for a hatchery as water is pumped through underwater cages where baby oysters are coddled and fed until ready to be distributed.

Davis and Erksine said that just finding out if the project can work will take at least six months. Construction could take more than a year, meaning the first generation of oysters could be three years in coming.

But if it works, such a facility could put out 3-5 million larvae and 50-100,000 seed oysters annually. Currently, local oyster businesses have to purchase baby bivalves from out of state hatcheries for success. There is only one commercial scale hatchery in Virginia, according to Erksine, although a Lancaster County hatchery was discovered during the Jan. 29 meeting there. There are hatcheries that could produce seed oysters but mainly do business in baby clams, reportedly.

And even then, according to Lake Cowart of Cowart Seafood, success is limited, which explains why three of the area’s largest companies in the industry are on board.

"Our interest is to provide seed for our own needs," Cowart said. "Our intention is to provide seed for other uses and people."

He said seed bought between 2005 and 2006 from Maine "lived pretty well" but that seed purchased previously from a lower peninsula hatchery struggled to survive in the salinity levels of the Coan and Yeocomico Rivers.

"We need local seed," Cowart said.

Other watermen of the area want their say and share of the idea.

Ken Smith of Heathsville is vice president of a local watermen’s association. He reiterated that his group is in favor of "a nursery in the Northern Neck," but added that they have "legitimate concerns about what it will do to oystermen."

He said they are afraid that the hundreds of new jobs the hatchery could bring would be given to temporary or migrant workers employed by the larger corporations, rather than the average oystermen working their own operations.

"We want to see someone who doesn’t have a monetary interest in it [on the management team]," Smith said. "These three companies control 1,000s of acres of oyster bottom."

Davis agreed and offered to include Smith on the team, which already includes representatives from the Virginia Institute for Marine Science and former secretary of natural resources Tayloe Murphy, who was at the Warsaw meeting. Also among the nearly 20 people attending the Warsaw meeting were supervisors Randy Packett and Courtney Sisson and county administrator Bill Duncanson.

"This is a transparent process," Erksine reiterated, adding that the seed could be equally spread along sanctuary and public grounds underwater.

"But it’s not going to be free," he added, saying that the seed can’t be given away.

Meanwhile, the process to secure the grant funding is the NNPDC’s top project right now, according to Davis.

"I think we’re very close to getting approval from both agencies to go ahead with the formal study," he said.

Money for the feasibility study is expected to come through the grants, which Davis is confident will be awarded.

"Funding sources will typically fund these kinds of projects," he said. "The oyster industry is a fraction of what it used to be. They’re interested because of the positive economic and environmental impacts."

Money for the construction, or phase two, of the hatchery could come from the companies backing the project, including Bevans, Cowart and Kellum seafood companies. Money from the grants, if awarded, could also be used towards building.

Where to put such a business is still undetermined.

"We’re assuming we can get a sight," Davis said, later saying that he thinks the land could "come in as a local match."

What sort of impact such an endeavor is expected to make on an ailing industry is unclear.

"Over harvesting took place about 100 years ago," Smith explained. "Decline came with disease. The oysterman is not the culprit, but the victim."

He wanted to know what measure of revitalization will be used to guide the project, whether it would be the boom of the 1800s, the plateau of the 1930s or the rates seen in the years "pre-durmo."

It was unclear what measure of success the project would be guided by.

 
by Maggie G. Hall

 

 

bsp;

 

February 10, 2008

Questions About The Northern Neck Oyster Hatchery

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing*, *Living in the Northern Neck* — admin @ 7:26 am

In my Northern Neck Update that I emailed out this month one of the things I wrote about was the oyster hatchery.

The response from that update has been phenomenal.

One person who responded asked several questions. 2 of those questions were:

 

1.    Didn't I read that they were planning to produce a non-native species that was thought to be better able to survive the existing pollution? 

2.    Would this cause any further decline for native species? 

 

The non-native oyster wouldn’t be able to survive pollution better (remember the oyster can filter a lot of pollution) but the non-native is resistant to the disease, dermo, which caused the most death of the native oyster.

What the oyster packers like about this oyster is it grows so fast. Much faster than the native oyster. Therefore they can plant this oyster and process it faster.

 

Now this creates a whole new set of questions. One of these would be if this non-native oyster would take over and we would lose the native oyster? When answering that question it opens another set of questions among which, is it worth losing the native oyster in order to clean the bay with this non-native?

 

NOW PAY ATTENTION! What can be done is that this non-native oyster can be produced in a hatchery as a triploid. What is a tripoid? A tripoid is a sterile oyster.

 

On the surface this sounds pretty good but there is another advantage to the oyster packer on this again. This tripoid is like the fattened calf. Calves that are grown for beef are castrated. This causes them to grow faster. The same is true with a tripoid oyster.

 

Here is one of my major concerns. This tripoid oyster is produced in a hatchery funded from public monies. The oyster packer wants total control of the hatchery. The seed produced goes on state owned bottom that has been leased back to the oyster packer. Sounds like corporate welfare to me but that is another issue.

 

Now you might be thinking well at least these oysters are filtering some of the pollutants. Yes, this is true but only in those tributaries that are close to the oyster packers facilities and they are not producing any larvae that the tide can move to settle on the other oyster beds in the bay’s tributaries. Those beds that are for the waterman to work and also open to any citizen of the state. Forget about the part for the waterman if you want ( I’ll address that in another post). Think about it in the filtering factor and bay clean-up.

 

This same hatchery could produce a native oyster.

 

Then your next question is, “Wouldn’t the disease, dermo cause this oyster to die?”

 

Answer, work is now being done with a disease resistant native oyster but even this isn’t going to help the bay if it is produced as a tripoid or without the help of the Chesapeake Bay's watermen.

 

I’ll try to explain that in my next post.

February 8, 2008

Crab Conditions in the Chesapeake Bay

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing*, *Living in the Northern Neck* — admin @ 7:46 am

The stock of crabs is low in the Chesapeake Bay. This is not the first time it has been low. It has been going on for years.

Restrictions are continually being placed on the crabber. But putting more restrictions on the crabber is not going to solve the problem, it is only going to slow the decline until the resource is eliminated. 

"The Virginia Marine Resource Commission Management Plan for Blue Crab" states that:

Ongoing losses in submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) that serves as primary nursery areas for juvenile crabs and reduction of oyster reefs that provide food and refuge for age 1+ crabs evidently impede the growth of this stock.  VIMS indicates there is evidence of high mortality rates of juvenile crabs tied to the loss of SAV, and this loss has a direct impact on recruitment to age 1+ .  The extent of predation on blue crabs by predators such as striped bass, red drum, and Atlantic croaker is unknown.

The report goes on to further say, "Despite evidence that the blue crab stock faces many environmental challenges, the management plan must continue to promote measures that can lead to annual exploitation rates that are near the target level exploitation rate (u = 0.46)."

Great Management!

Don't fix the problem.

It takes more than a bumper sticker that says, "Save the Bay" 

 

 

January 30, 2008

Northern Neck Oyster Hatchery

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing*, *Living in the Northern Neck* — admin @ 4:35 am

A grant is trying to be obtained for a feasibility study for a oyster hatchery here in the Northern Neck.

It is being hyped as bringing the oyster industry back to the Northern Neck with the possibility of producing billions of seed oysters.

Please pay attention to this as it progresses. Billions of oysters would save the bay with their filtering ability.

If there are going to be goverment funds to conduct this study then the results of that study should benefit the public and not just the private oyster companies.

More than bringing the oyster industry back to the Northern Neck the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay is a bigger concern. The oyster could do that. 

January 23, 2008

Northern Neck Waterman are the Victims not the Culprits

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing*, *Living in the Northern Neck* — admin @ 8:56 am

As most know I was a waterman before I became a Realtor.

I enjoy meeting new people and working as a real estate salesman here in the Northern Neck. However, I would still be working on the water if it were as profitable as it once was. 

Yesterday I went to the VMRC meeting in Newport News. Again they want to take more from the waterman even though it is proven that the water is not overfishing. Other factors have resulted in the decline of the Chesapeake Bay's resources but again the the Commission is attacking the waterman.

December 6, 2007

Northern Neck Fishing December 5, 2007

Filed under: *Fishing and Crabbing*, *Living in the Northern Neck* — admin @ 7:11 am

We do have good fishing here in the Northern Neck but no we don't catch fish in the Wal-Mart parking lot.

Yesterday I told the boys to meet we there.

When we return Bill Oakes was unloading the fish from my cooler to theirs.

I asked him to hold up 1 of the fish so you could see the size and type of fish we are catching now.

Remember when I'm not fishing I sell real estate.

Sometimes people get confused but what is the use for living in the Northern Neck if you can't enjoy it.

Next Page »